Output of P34 incorrect caused by side effects of P04

[pieterhijma]

This is related to #11 which should be handled first. This issue may be a larger issue, but the test for P34 runs P04 which will add new classes to the model. This causes P34 to report different output than https://oops.linkeddata.es/.

The output from https://oops.linkeddata.es is:

  <oops:Pitfall>
    <oops:Code>P34</oops:Code><oops:Name>Untyped class</oops:Name>
    <oops:Description>An ontology element is used as a class without having been explicitly declared as such using the primitives owl:Class or rdfs:Class. This pitfall is related with the common problems listed in [8].	</oops:Description>
    <oops:Importance>Important</oops:Importance>
    <oops:NumberAffectedElements>6</oops:NumberAffectedElements>
    <oops:Affects>
      <oops:AffectedElement>http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/testP34#ClassJ</oops:AffectedElement>
      <oops:AffectedElement>http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/testP34#ClassH</oops:AffectedElement>
      <oops:AffectedElement>http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/testP34#ClassF</oops:AffectedElement>
      <oops:AffectedElement>http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/testP34#ClassI</oops:AffectedElement>
      <oops:AffectedElement>http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/testP34#ClassE</oops:AffectedElement>
      <oops:AffectedElement>http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/testP34#ClassD</oops:AffectedElement>
    </oops:Affects>
  </oops:Pitfall>

The output from running the test in #10 is:

<http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/5c3b8c7d-e196-4a3c-ab78-1645ad4b3380>
        a                               oops:pitfall;
        oops:hasAffectedElement         
            "http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/testP34#ClassJ"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI> , 
            "http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/testP34#ClassH"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI> , 
            "http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/testP34#ClassF"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI>;
        oops:hasCode                    "P34 - Untyped class";
        oops:hasDescription             "An ontology element is used as a class without having been explicitly declared as such using the primitives owl:Class or rdfs:Class. This pitfall is related with the common problems listed in [8].";
        oops:hasImportanceLevel         "MINOR";
        oops:hasName                    "Untyped class";
        oops:hasNumberAffectedElements  3 .

The question is if we want to keep these side effects or not.

To run the test, please execute the following:

./run/test-pitfall.sh P34

[pieterhijma]

@mariapoveda confirmed that there should be no side effects.