Further Enhance the Modified Resource Object (refer to Proposal #499) #520
pagbabian-splunk
started this conversation in
Proposals
Replies: 1 comment
-
Some thoughts:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Per discussion, #499 and https://opencybersecu-lz97379.slack.com/archives/C03C2QPSBPB/p1678455114481899, I took a shot at enhancing and tweaking @k2niner Kevin's
resource
object. The intent was to fix the standard enums, called out by @rroupski-splunk but also to further generalize it so that it could be used formanaged_entity
rather than having a discrete object for that attribute (the type ofentity
would need to be changed toresource
frommanaged_entity
).Note: the enum values need descriptions: e.g. for Platform Specific, 'additional resources added via a Profile`
As with #499 this is breaking due to the
type_id
addition being Required.Added:
data
andversion
, frommanaged_entity
;is_managed
Added:
policy
anduser
for when the resource is one of those, consistent withfile
anddevice
Modified: some descriptions, for example for
file
to include document, folder, configuration file enum typesModified: the enum list, fixing the standard Unknown and Other, and adding Platform Specific (98)
0 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions