Support todo.txt format [will not be implemented] #62
Replies: 4 comments 3 replies
-
Thanks for the suggestion! I like the idea. However, this would require some effort and it is currently not a priority for me. On a side note: Supporting letters as priority should be possible when I add priorities. Some things are not entirely clear to me. For example, I am not sure how you would do context and project tags. What would you suggest? Also: would all todos be in a single file or would we need to parse every line of every file in the vault to find all todos? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'd also like this as an import/export capability. The format is in order:
in the text of the todo there are conventions that have been adopted:
today I can put the projects and contexts in one of your todos and you have recurring. Seems export would be a good first stepes to create a new note in the same folder with the export. For import you could also make the projects and contexts tags, and use an emoji for each to represent in obsidian. like you do for due date today. I think the start/scheduled would overlap in meaning for todo.txt as start doesn't hide hide anything but todo.txt is extensible so maybe sch:YYY-MM-DD is used for scheduled. For me, having an export would be #1 of what is there already. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The focus of the Tasks plugin is on getting data from Markdown lists. The todo.txt format is completely different, and not compatible with the Tasks code. As said above, it should be a different plugin. And existing workload from user requests is already immense. So I am marking this wontfix, to avoid any expectation that it will be fixed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since Discussions can now be closed, I am closing this, which was already marked as "status: wontfix". |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The todo.txt format is quite widely used and supported by other tools. How things are specified is clearly defined. Is there a reason not to support that format? It feels like it would extend the applicability of this - the widespread use of that format plus the power of your querying tools would make a good combination.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions