Align the way rust and typescript are defining field paramaters

[dmtrKovalenko]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Seeing the PR #751 made me think that it would be possible to resolve the problem I am struggling with for quite some time.

In rust

let value = MyStruct {
   my_param: 13
};

If I want to work with my_param I need to use @parameter text object, but in typescript with the exact same code

let value = MyStruct {
  my_param: 13
}

I have to use @variable for whatever reason

Describe the solution you'd like
Have similar code in different languages to be handled in the similar way either @parameter or @Attribute in both cases

Describe alternatives you've considered
to suffer

[kiyoon]

So in Typescript, an object is often used for function parameters. But I think in Rust it's not the case because of efficiency.

Currently, for the sake of simplicity the @parameter should select an entire parameter and there's no distinction between the @parameter.name and @parameter.value (some languages don't even support named arguments).

@variable is not part of this plugin and I believe it's a highlighting definition from nvim-treesitter. The purpose of highlighting queries is not for textobjects so we can't guarantee the alignment of it across languages.

TL;DR

1. @parameter.name is not supported in the plugin yet. So what you want to do can't be done without custom queries or queries from another plugin.
2. If we want to align @parameter.inner and @parameter.outer, then the Rust behaviour has to change to match Typescript. Typescript one is correct.

[dmtrKovalenko]

You mean the parse itself?

[kiyoon]

parsing is done by treesitter which and the grammar supports it. But we don't have a query to select just parameter names