-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Open
Description
Thanks for sharing the code and dataset,
I couldn't find the random forest code in the repo, and I tried to train it myself but I couldn't get the accuracy reported in the paper:
RF/Frequential 51.12 / 3.83
RF/Temporal 60.87 / 3.51
My code is like:
participants = np.load('../data/PhyDAA/Dataset/participant.npy')
labels = np.load('../data/PhyDAA/Dataset/Label.npy')
freqfeature = np.load('../data/PhyDAA/Dataset/Array/freq_band.npy')
tempfeature = np.load('../data/PhyDAA/Dataset/Array/hjorth.npy')
feature = freqfeature.reshape(freqfeature.shape[0], -1)
feature = tempfeature.reshape(tempfeature.shape[0], -1)
logo = LeaveOneGroupOut()
rf = RandomForestClassifier()
accs = cross_val_score(rf, feature, labels, groups=participants, cv=logo)
print(accs.mean(), accs.std())
I get 49% and 53% instead of 51% and 60%. Do you have any idea? maybe setting wrong the RF parameters :?
Also the deviations are much more than the reported ones.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels