was namespace considered (i.e falso
)?
#357
Unanswered
gerardolima
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey, folks, I recently learned about
falso
and it looks good -- thank you already for your work! When I started writing tests, though, I missed using a namespace and felt like the choice of exporting top-level functions led to the usage of therand
prefix, instead (thought this is not completely consistent). As I think this would provide better developer experience, I wonder whether this option was considered.For example, please, refer to the alternative code below:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions