You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been trying different connection configurations to describe a network fiber tap and I would like to know what's the correct or designed way to describe this following:
A modular fiber tab chassis (Datacom FTC-24 specifically) with MTP 12 channel 4 port modules.
The chassis itself is less important but module rear/front port distribution is, each module has 4 ports NETA/NETB and MONA/MONB.
NETA to NETB are your standard patching setup rx to tx and tx to rx.
NETA forward its rx to MONA tx
NETA forwards its tx to MONB tx
See diagrams below:
In Netbox terms what would be the correct way to describe this?
NETA as rear port with the rest as front connecting to the NETA
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I've been trying different connection configurations to describe a network fiber tap and I would like to know what's the correct or designed way to describe this following:
A modular fiber tab chassis (Datacom FTC-24 specifically) with MTP 12 channel 4 port modules.
The chassis itself is less important but module rear/front port distribution is, each module has 4 ports NETA/NETB and MONA/MONB.
NETA to NETB are your standard patching setup rx to tx and tx to rx.
NETA forward its rx to MONA tx
NETA forwards its tx to MONB tx
See diagrams below:
In Netbox terms what would be the correct way to describe this?
NETA as rear port with the rest as front connecting to the NETA
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions