Replies: 1 comment
-
Looks like the figures on the right involve smaller grain sphericities, so:
You'd need to adjust the actual values. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello Professor Dr. @rquey,
I hope you will be fine. Professor, I tried a lot to make the exact microstructure but couldn't get the same results and there is a little bit difference. Professor, please have a look at the attached pictures, in which I mentioned both models (our model and literature model). You will find quite difference in these two models.
My models commands as follows:
For Fig-A, I have used this command;
neper -T -n 100 -morpho gg -reg 1
neper -T -n 100 -morpho "diameq:lognormal(1,0.032),1-sphericity:lognormal(0.0123,0.03)" -domain "square(0.05,0.1)" -dim 2
For Fig-B, I have used a command;
neper -T -n 100 -morpho gg -reg 1
neper -T -n 100 -morpho "diameq:lognormal(1,0.06),1-sphericity:lognormal(0.0123,0.03)" -domain "square(0.05,0.1)" -dim 2
Professor, please give me suggestions what I need to do through which I get the same model.
I am waiting for your kind response.
Thank you.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions