Skip to content

Conversation

@nedhmn
Copy link
Owner

@nedhmn nedhmn commented May 16, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added an automated workflow to run linting and type checks on code changes.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 16, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@nedhmn has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 25 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 18f9b2b and ce994c1.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
  • packages/embeddings/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/pinecone/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/ui/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/utils/package.json (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow configuration file named "lint.yml" has been added. This workflow automates linting and type checking for a Turborepo-based project, running on pushes to the main branch, pull requests, and manual dispatches. It sets up the environment, installs dependencies, and runs lint and type-check scripts.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/lint.yml Added a GitHub Actions workflow for automated linting and type checking in a Turborepo-based project.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHub
    participant Workflow (Lint)
    participant Runner (Ubuntu)
    participant Turborepo
    participant pnpm

    GitHub->>Workflow (Lint): Trigger (push, PR, or manual)
    Workflow (Lint)->>Runner (Ubuntu): Start job
    Runner (Ubuntu)->>GitHub: Checkout code
    Runner (Ubuntu)->>pnpm: Setup pnpm@9
    Runner (Ubuntu)->>Runner (Ubuntu): Setup Node.js v22 with pnpm cache
    Runner (Ubuntu)->>pnpm: Install dependencies
    Runner (Ubuntu)->>Turborepo: Set remote cache env vars
    Runner (Ubuntu)->>Runner (Ubuntu): Run lint scripts
    Runner (Ubuntu)->>Runner (Ubuntu): Run type checks
Loading

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)

26-50: Consider refining checkout depth and Node version pinning

  • For Turborepo’s remote caching to work reliably, use a full clone: set fetch-depth: 0 in actions/checkout.
  • If you don’t specifically need Node 22, pin to an LTS alias (e.g., "20.x" or "lts/*") for greater stability.

Example diff:

       - name: Check out code
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
-        with:
-          fetch-depth: 2
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        with:
+          fetch-depth: 0

       - name: Setup Node.js environment
-        uses: actions/setup-node@v4
-        with:
-          node-version: 22
-          cache: "pnpm"
+        uses: actions/setup-node@v4
+        with:
+          node-version: "20.x"
+          cache: "pnpm"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0e3830c and 18f9b2b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/lint.yml

10-10: invalid activity type "synchronized" for "pull_request" Webhook event. available types are "assigned", "auto_merge_disabled", "auto_merge_enabled", "closed", "converted_to_draft", "demilestoned", "dequeued", "edited", "enqueued", "labeled", "locked", "milestoned", "opened", "ready_for_review", "reopened", "review_request_removed", "review_requested", "synchronize", "unassigned", "unlabeled", "unlocked"

(events)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)

14-25: Ensure Turborepo remote caching is actually leveraged
You’ve set TURBO_TOKEN and TURBO_TEAM for remote caching, but this workflow only runs pnpm lint and pnpm check-types. Verify that your scripts invoke Turborepo (e.g., turbo run lint or turbo run check-types) so the cache settings take effect. Otherwise, those env vars are unused.

@nedhmn nedhmn closed this May 16, 2025
@nedhmn nedhmn deleted the feature/web-chatbot-ui branch May 16, 2025 03:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants