Skip to content

License ? #60

@lonetwin

Description

@lonetwin

It's unclear what license applies to this codebase. It would be nice to have a clear FOSS license specified. I propose a MIT license which essentially provides maximum flexibility to any developer as well as user.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions