Skip to content

Support for Tunnels servers setup / Tunneling #4213

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
1 task done
rtrexmass opened this issue May 8, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

Support for Tunnels servers setup / Tunneling #4213

rtrexmass opened this issue May 8, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rtrexmass
Copy link

rtrexmass commented May 8, 2025

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Hi, i am trying to setup a server using playit.gg, since allows it to not display my real IP address, which i am not comfortable with, and allows me to not pay for hosting since i already have dedicated hardware, the server works fine even with redirect and i am able to set the MTA server port as the random port that playit.gg provides, the problem is, i can't choose the master server query port, but i worked it around by calculating the port that the tunnel gives, and setting the port number for the server as -123 that port, then there will be no redirect from the master server query port, the problem is that MTA Master Server queries the IP that sends the packet from the local machine, and that will always be the ISP.

"[19:33:00] Querying MTA master server... success! (Auto detected IP:ISP-IP)"

With the current setup my server is functional, but it cant be queried by the master server.

Describe the solution you'd like

MTA Server Query ignores "<serverip>auto</serverip>"

If we could set a parameter to inform the public IP, tunneling and querying should work with no problem, either with a new parameter

Or, with the existing "<serverip>iphere</serverip>", if the user sets to auto, it should query from the packet, if not, that IP should be used as the IP that will be broadcasted

Describe alternatives you've considered

Also, allow the user to set the master server query port with a custom parameter, would be nice.

Additional context

No response

Security Policy

  • I have read and understood the Security Policy and this issue is not about a cheat or security vulnerability.
@rtrexmass rtrexmass added the enhancement New feature or request label May 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant