ABI: Missing keys "mpi_{integer|logical}16_supported"

[dalcinl]

The listing of predefined info keys in MPI_ABI_GET_FORTRAN_INFO is missing the "mpi_{integer|logical}16_supported" entries.

@jeffhammond simply forgot to remove the comment in two lines of the LaTeX sources:

diff --git a/chap-abi/abi.tex b/chap-abi/abi.tex
index 72280f73..21355944 100644
--- a/chap-abi/abi.tex
+++ b/chap-abi/abi.tex
@@ -433,12 +433,12 @@ The following keys are predefined for this object:
 \item[\infokeymain{mpi\_logical2\_supported}:]  (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_LOGICAL2} is supported.
 \item[\infokeymain{mpi\_logical4\_supported}:]  (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_LOGICAL4} is supported.
 \item[\infokeymain{mpi\_logical8\_supported}:]  (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_LOGICAL8} is supported.
-%\item[\infokeymain{mpi\_logical16\_supported}:] (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_LOGICAL16} is supported.
+\item[\infokeymain{mpi\_logical16\_supported}:] (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_LOGICAL16} is supported.
 \item[\infokeymain{mpi\_integer1\_supported}:]  (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_INTEGER1} is supported.
 \item[\infokeymain{mpi\_integer2\_supported}:]  (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_INTEGER2} is supported.
 \item[\infokeymain{mpi\_integer4\_supported}:]  (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_INTEGER4} is supported.
 \item[\infokeymain{mpi\_integer8\_supported}:]  (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_INTEGER8} is supported.
-%\item[\infokeymain{mpi\_integer16\_supported}:] (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_INTEGER16} is supported.
+\item[\infokeymain{mpi\_integer16\_supported}:] (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_INTEGER16} is supported.
 \item[\infokeymain{mpi\_real2\_supported}:]     (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_REAL2} is supported.
 \item[\infokeymain{mpi\_real4\_supported}:]     (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_REAL4} is supported.
 \item[\infokeymain{mpi\_real8\_supported}:]     (boolean) \mpidtype{MPI\_REAL8} is supported.

[wesbland]

@jeffhammond Is this something you plan to do as a no-no for MPI 5?

[jeffhammond]

If necessary, but it's a very clear latex typo that should be fixed as an editorial change. If we don't make this change, we'll have an inconsistent document.

[wesbland]

Cool. So.... PR then?

[dalcinl]

Cool. So.... PR then?

mpi-forum/mpi-standard#1120