You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/workflow/implementing/messaging/limitations.md
+4-1Lines changed: 4 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -6,11 +6,14 @@ slug: /messaging/limitations
6
6
7
7
### History state of past experiments ###
8
8
9
-
It is currently not possible to enroll users into experiments based on previous experiments that they might have been a part of. If multiple messaging campaigns go out as experiments targeting different surfaces it is not possible to ensure that users will not see both campaigns.
9
+
If multiple messaging campaigns go out as experiments targeting different surfaces it is possible that users would see both campaigns.
10
+
10
11
Mitigation is possible through the use of groups for frequency capping. If the experiments happen simultaneously, then using the same group can ensure we control the time it takes for a user to see both campaigns.
11
12
12
13
Similarly (using targeting) it is possible to prevent a user from seeing a message if impressions from a different message are present. This is only possible if the two messages overlap in the system at the same time.
13
14
15
+
It is also possible to specifically include or exclude users into experiments based on previous experiments that they might have been a part of.
16
+
14
17
:::info
15
18
Note that when using targeting or groups in this way the message **impressions** are removed once the message has been removed or the experiment has ended.
0 commit comments