You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We tried to integrate CodeCarbon into the training of a deep model (LSTM) for a master's course final project we're doing, but the runtime increased by 2 times compared to not using CodeCarbon. I couldn't find a source to how computationally intensive is code carbon, only that it has been built to be very light. What's with the significant slowing down of the code execution? And what is the computational overhead of adding CodeCarbon?
Thank you in advance, cheers
Ivan
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
We tried to integrate CodeCarbon into the training of a deep model (LSTM) for a master's course final project we're doing, but the runtime increased by 2 times compared to not using CodeCarbon. I couldn't find a source to how computationally intensive is code carbon, only that it has been built to be very light. What's with the significant slowing down of the code execution? And what is the computational overhead of adding CodeCarbon?
Thank you in advance, cheers
Ivan
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions