Any specific use case for supporting only VARCHAR datatype and not NVARCHAR #22871
ade-owasp-sf
started this conversation in
Ideas & Feature requests
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Agree, it is valuable for Unicode strings. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Bump, is there any solution to this yet? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Not yet. I suppose NVARCHAR is a new data type of field. So far we haven't put it in our plan. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Any specific use case for supporting only VARCHAR datatype and not NVARCHAR
With NVARCHAR there will be less code page issues.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions