You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been using this SDK for a few days now and while it is helpful, I do have a few questions? Is there any way to simpilfy the request configuration setup? Especially filters. I hope this is taken jokingly yet seriously... but the filter expression reminds me of ADSI filters and not in a good way.
I'd love to learn a way to do this in a more type safety way then embedding these complex strings in my code. It seems like it'd be particularly nice if I could just use a standard LINQ approach and let the lazy evaluation get translated into API calls behind the scenes. Is it a matter of this just doesn't exist yet or are there good reasons why that would be a bad idea?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I've been using this SDK for a few days now and while it is helpful, I do have a few questions? Is there any way to simpilfy the request configuration setup? Especially filters. I hope this is taken jokingly yet seriously... but the filter expression reminds me of ADSI filters and not in a good way.
I'd love to learn a way to do this in a more type safety way then embedding these complex strings in my code. It seems like it'd be particularly nice if I could just use a standard LINQ approach and let the lazy evaluation get translated into API calls behind the scenes. Is it a matter of this just doesn't exist yet or are there good reasons why that would be a bad idea?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions