[Feature Request] Sample with loader-less loading of Monaco Editor for the most basic usage #3803
Unanswered
vadimkantorov
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
Currently, I ripped off all files in https://unpkg.com/browse/monaco-editor@0.34.1/min/vs/ and copied them over my website. It appears that there's few required files, but they are placed in several-layer directory structures :( And it still would allow to kick-start hacking, if there was a variant that did not require a loader and it was possible to simply |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I'd also love to use the monaco editor in a no build app 🙏 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Context
Description
Hi!
I'm building a rudimentary client-side, in-browser LaTeX compiler (TexLive transpiled with Emscripten) and editor (https://busytex.github.io).
The only dependency of this project is Monaco Editor (and I am not using any web tools such as npm/webpack - just one HTML file and five JS files). Currently, I'm loading Monaco Editor from unpkg.com CDN with an AMD loader. Ideally, I would like to get rid of the loader, host all Monaco JS/CSS files directly on my GitHub Pages and load all Monaco files directly with
<script>
/<style>
tags. It would be great to have a sample for a basic usage like this at https://github.com/microsoft/monaco-editor/tree/main/samples (maybe adopt the sample from #2335 (comment) ?).Maybe related/duplicate to #2335. But I'm not understanding client-side world enough to tell / understand properly various loaders technologies. Please feel free to close this if duplicate or point me to a sample already achieving this.
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions