don't forget to tip stacc

[svc01-metaplex]

Submitter: staccDOTsol
Email: jarettrsdunn+git@gmail.com
Submitter wallet: 89VB5UmvopuCFmp5Mf8YPX28fGvvqn79afCgouQuPyhY
Submission transaction: 5Y7YQW1hRbQtj3UEHxxkWKVe33LbKKi9uy8VVsG8ZuJRRfRfHPy9ijrRytBcNpbjoFWUvMk5Km4nYPaS95PgYD2G
Title: don't forget to tip stacc
Links: https://x.com/STACCoverflow/status/1920856178113872127

@metaplex taking all that extra rent is the exact same argument I tried when I wrote the candymachine refund commit. I tried giving an optional default to charity and a 1% fee to myself when other people emptied their own candymachines and later argued with @_austbot that we should just make a cutoff for all the cmv1 candy machines (that nobody can even mint from anymore cuz the metadata program has upgraded)

if @MetaplexFndn has moved away from this model of not stealing from people (they apparently have) then do what's right, empty the cmv1 candy machines and give it to me so I can give it to pump. you're not using it and the cm creators don't care either.

Testing, testing, testing governance - is this thing on?

[MetaplexFoundation]

The Metaplex Foundation is screening out this proposal for lack of critical details. As required by MIP-005, community MIP proposals must include the necessary details to clearly evaluate proposed technical changes to the Metaplex Program Library. Community MIP proposals should serve as a blue print for implementation of any proposed program updates.