Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hey @JvE-iO ! Great question. Our company uses .NET, so there is certainly interest from at least some people in that. One of our engineers has even worked on his own kind of specific .NET recording software, and IIRC there is not really a fundamental architectural limitation. One issue is that the .NET runtime uses JIT a lot, and supporting instrumentation/tracking of JIT-ted code is not easy, so those cases are one of the hardest for us to support currently. If one turns off the JIT for a debugging scenario, this might make it easier, but I am not sure how useful would this be. For now we're focused on natively compiled(AOT) languages and simpler VM-s(interpreters). C# has an AOT compiler now, but I assume it's not yet as universal as the VM. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I just took the survey and unfortunately there was no option to choose C# or .NET.
Is this due to a fundamental architectural limitiation?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions