Removed inlining attribute due to huge performance hit

Author: master131

BrotliSharpLib/BrotliSharpLib.csproj

@@ -6,16 +6,16 @@
 		<NoWarn>1570;1701</NoWarn>
 	</PropertyGroup>
 	<PropertyGroup>
-		<Version>0.1.1</Version>
-		<FileVersion>0.1.1</FileVersion>
+		<Version>0.2</Version>
+		<FileVersion>0.2.0</FileVersion>
 		<Authors>master131</Authors>
 		<Description>Full C# port of Brotli compression library.</Description>
 		<Copyright>Copyright (c) 2017 master131</Copyright>
 		<RepositoryUrl>https://github.com/master131/BrotliSharpLib</RepositoryUrl>
 		<GeneratePackageOnBuild>True</GeneratePackageOnBuild>
 		<RepositoryType>git</RepositoryType>
 		<PackageTags>brotli;csharp;net</PackageTags>
-		<AssemblyVersion>0.1.1.0</AssemblyVersion>
+		<AssemblyVersion>0.2.0.0</AssemblyVersion>
 		<PackageLicenseUrl>https://github.com/master131/BrotliSharpLib/blob/master/LICENSE</PackageLicenseUrl>
 		<PackageProjectUrl>https://github.com/master131/BrotliSharpLib</PackageProjectUrl>
 	</PropertyGroup>

BrotliSharpLib/Encode/BackwardReferencesHQ.cs

@@ -171,9 +171,6 @@ private static unsafe float ZopfliCostModelGetDistanceCost(
             return self->cost_dist_[distcode];
         }
 
-#if AGGRESSIVE_INLINING
-        [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]
-#endif
         private static unsafe float ZopfliCostModelGetLiteralCosts(
             ZopfliCostModel* self, size_t from, size_t to) {
             return self->literal_costs_[to] - self->literal_costs_[from];

BrotliSharpLib/Encode/Command.cs

@@ -37,9 +37,6 @@ internal struct Command {
             public ushort dist_prefix_;
         }
 
-#if AGGRESSIVE_INLINING
-        [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]
-#endif
         private static ushort GetInsertLengthCode(size_t insertlen)
         {
             if (insertlen < 6)
@@ -69,9 +66,6 @@ private static ushort GetInsertLengthCode(size_t insertlen)
             }
         }
 
-#if AGGRESSIVE_INLINING
-        [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]
-#endif
         private static unsafe ushort GetCopyLengthCode(size_t copylen)
         {
             if (copylen < 10)
@@ -93,9 +87,6 @@ private static unsafe ushort GetCopyLengthCode(size_t copylen)
             }
         }
 
-#if AGGRESSIVE_INLINING
-        [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]
-#endif
         private static ushort CombineLengthCodes(
             ushort inscode, ushort copycode, bool use_last_distance)
         {
@@ -168,9 +159,6 @@ increase by BROTLI_NUM_DISTANCE_SHORT_CODES - 1  */
             }
         }
 
-#if AGGRESSIVE_INLINING
-        [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]
-#endif
         private static unsafe uint CommandCopyLenCode(Command* self)
         {
             return (self->copy_len_ & 0xFFFFFF) ^ (self->copy_len_ >> 24);

README.md

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ Performance can also be further improved by building BrotliSharpLib using .NET F
 
 ### Benchmark
 
-The following are benchmark results using [DotNetBenchmark](https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet) with BrotliSharpLib (v0.1.1) and [Google's C# implementation](https://github.com/google/brotli/tree/master/csharp/org/brotli/dec) built against .NET Framework 4.6.1. The original C version was compiled in Release mode using Visual Studio 2017 (v141) as a 64-bit Windows executable.
+The following are benchmark results using [DotNetBenchmark](https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet) with BrotliSharpLib (v0.2) and [Google's C# implementation](https://github.com/google/brotli/tree/master/csharp/org/brotli/dec) built against .NET Framework 4.6.1. The original C version was compiled in Release mode using Visual Studio 2017 (v141) as a 64-bit Windows executable.
 
 ``` ini
 BenchmarkDotNet=v0.10.6, OS=Windows 10 Redstone 2 (10.0.15063)
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ File: UPX v3.91 (Windows Executable)
  |     Original C |        6 |    36.540 ms |
  | BrotliSharpLib |        9 |   116.318 ms |
  |     Original C |        9 |    73.080 ms |
- | BrotliSharpLib |       11 | 4,476.191 ms |
+ | BrotliSharpLib |       11 |  2201.000 ms |
  |     Original C |       11 |    877.58 ms |
 
- While BrotliSharpLib performs comparatively at lower quality levels, it performs up to five times worse at level 11. Future versions of the port will hopefully bring this down.
+ While BrotliSharpLib performs comparatively at lower quality levels, it performs up to three times worse at level 11. Future versions of the port will hopefully bring this down.