Final things for first release

[martindholmes]

Arising out of the Council meeting today (2020-01-30):

• SB: Compile a list of the possible locations for the main text in the Guidelines chapters, along with pros and cons for each; make this a table poll on the original TEI ticket and have Council vote on whether the location is the best one, or it should include a mention with a pointer. Suggested locations include between 16.12 and 16.13, 17, 11.6... (core (around about notes), linking/seg/align, primary sources, writing modes, new chapter?)
• MH: Finish the section with a new example which is based on something like Figure 1: Kamo no Mabuchi, Man’yoshū Taikō, from Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Libri japon. 262/264 from the original submission, where the hand is different for the rts.
• SB: Fix duplicate ids across examples.
• SB: Validate all egXMLs (of course).
• N/A: Fix Schematron: move it up to the element level rather than the <attDef> level so that it works in RNG. — not necessary, works as is (tested in oXygen 23.0)
• Move work to a branch of dev and fix any fallout — via PR, right?

Deadline for all this: Feb 6, giving us time to merge it before the freeze.

[martinascholger]

Poll on possible locations for the main text

section in the GLs	full section*	reference**	comment
Core: before or after notes	MDH, SB		MH thinks it will be a good fit with exactly this context, and it will be easy to segue into it. SB: after notes; i.e. the new 3.8.2
Linking / Segmentation / Alignment: between 16.11 and 16.13		MDH, SB	(This means a new paragraph in 16.12, right? —SB)
Simple Analytic Mechanisms: between 17.2 and 17.4		MDH [SB]	***
as part of Writing Modes		MDH	When we come to deal with emphasis marks in combination with ruby, this might be the place for that.
Primary Source: between 11.3 and 11.4		MDH [SB]	†
Primary Source: between 11.4. and 11.5		MDH [SB]	†

*the full section on ruby glosses should go there
**there should be a reference to ruby section
***SB suggests a reference in a new paragraph in 17.4 before start of 17.4.1
†SB leans towards a mention of ruby as part of both 11.3 and 11.4 in the paragraphs before the 1st subsection of each

[ebeshero]

@martinascholger @sydb @martindholmes Just noting that I (and probably other council members) do not have edit access to the posting above so we can't vote here. It's probably okay if everyone's comfortable voting over in Slack.

[ebeshero]

Alternatively, move the poll to one of the TEI repos?