Minor discrepancies with POSIX behaviour.

[happybeing]

This is a low priority list of things which appear out of step with POSIX style fs behaviour. For any other things like this I'll just add to this issue.

• already mentioned on the forum, sn_fs reports directory sizes as '0' whereas they appear to be at least the minimum block size (e.g. 4096) on Ubuntu.
• ls -al of a directory should include entries for '.' and '..' as below, whereas for sn_fs these are missing.

PS I've attached a script which I used to test my now defunct SAFE Drive, tweaked slightly to test sn_fs and it passes all tests on Ubuntu 20.04. 🎉

You'll have to rename the .txt to .sh to use it of course. test-sn_fs.sh.txt

It expects to be run from the root of a git repo with the script in a tests subdirectory, for example:

cd ~/sn_fs
mkdir -p ~/SAFE
sn_fs ~/SAFE &
./tests/test-sn_fs.sh mock|disk

I'll also try some of the manual tests which gave SAFE Drive problems.

[dan-da]

thx for filing the issue and for the test script! I'll try it out later.