Ambiguous licensing

[criswell]

The licensing on this project is ambiguous. There does not appear to be (at present) any discernible copyright/license file, and copyright/license statements are included in some files (ZPL2.1, but they seem to be on imported code).

If the intent of this project is to release it as some sort of Open Source, I'd strongly suggest taking a look at the OSI license page, http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.html , or the GNU Project's license page, http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html , and picking one.

[madlag]

Thanks for raising this, I will update the project as well.
I think I am going GPL, but still has to think a bit about this (vs MIT ).