-
I am considering to switch from the digital encoders to analog one (e.g. https://www.mouser.de/ProductDetail/Alpha-Taiwan/RV142FPF-40B1-15F-0B20K-004?qs=XeJtXLiO41TzHkmiDnL8fQ%3D%3D). Are those supported? I was looking for input_params/count mode to configure it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
No, that won't work—you'd need two analog inputs and some trigonometry to calculate the position. High-resolution optical encoders usually provide two sinusoidal signals shifted by 90°, and it's common to use intermediary electronics to convert these signals into high-resolution incremental outputs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The signals are triangles. The encoders are used in this teensy project, just FYI |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
You get encoders without detents from the usual suspects. E.g. Alps, Bourns..
Without detents you can set the count mode of those encoders to FULL which would give you 4 times the resolution. Countmode FULL would still guarantee to settle at the correct position but it will count up and down a few counts during the bouncing time. If you only use them to adjust some settings like e.g. volume this shouldn't be a problem.
If you want better quality and even higher resolution you should look for oil damped optical encoders. IIRC Bourns has them. Be prepared to pay something in the 30USD range for those. https://bourns.com/products/encoders/optical-encoders