v2.3.1

[Mtze]

What's Changed

• Assessment: Adapt Student Assessment for Design Review by @rappm in Assessment: Adapt Student Assessment for Design Review #584

• Assessment: Show progress diagrams in Assessment Overview by @rappm in Assessment: Show progress diagrams in Assessment Overview #583

• Assessment: adapt assessment ScoreLevels from 4 to 5 ScoreLevels by @rappm in Assessment: adapt assessment ScoreLevels from 4 to 5 ScoreLevels #580

• Core: Fix Semester Tag Input Handling to only allow lowercase and numbers by @mathildeshagl in Core: Fix Semester Tag Input Handling to only allow lowercase and numbers #581

• Core: Bump requests from 2.32.3 to 2.32.4 in /docs in the pip group across 1 directory by @dependabot in Bump requests from 2.32.3 to 2.32.4 in /docs in the pip group across 1 directory #586

• Documentation: Added the User Guide by @niclasheun in Documentation: Added the User Guide #553

• General: Integrate Server Tests into dev and prod workflow by @rappm in General: Integrate Server Tests into dev and prod workflow #572

• General: Only regenerate API spec on change in the respective server by @rappm in General: Only regenerate API spec on change in the respective server #574

• General: bump version to 2.3.1 by @rappm in General: bump version to 2.3.1 #587

Full Changelog: v2.3.0...v2.3.1

---

This discussion was created from the release v2.3.1.

[Mtze]

Please provide Tool Feedback In this thread

[MaximilianAnzinger]

Things you might consider in the future for the assessment:

• Erase assessment (I'm unable to delete a rating once it's set)
• Up for discussion/todo flag (not final)
• Suggestion and Average Grade for each category

[rappm]

• Erase assessment (I'm unable to delete a rating once it's set)

Nice! Issue Created: #592

• Up for discussion/todo flag (not final)

Good idea, would you prefer a solution that gives you kind of a TODO that you can set per competency, so you can get back to it later or something that flags an assessment/part of an assessment so a second instructor/tutor has a look at it?

• Suggestion and Average Grade for each category

Cool idea, I opened an issue for that here, feel free to add details => #591

[rampecke]

Not sure if you also want UI Feedback, but here are some things you could consider:

• Layout: Your entire application is designed to use full width, but now on the first page you don't do it for the search/filter row & table (you have now 3 vertical lines that break the look of your entire design) -> I would just make the searchbar itself fill the rest width and for the table, I don't get why it is shorter then the page width

• Filter: I guess you want to add more Filters in the future and section them in this Filter Button, but for now it is really anintuitve that there are only filter options for the assessment and it's not called Assessments instead of Filters

• Filter Options: They look like a Bug the way you implemented them, you add the checkmark in front when it is selected but if it is not selected there is only a super big empty space looking super weird, especially with the Pill Design it is not clear that those are options to select -> I would either show a indication like a box that you can check them or if you want to keep your style move the checkmark to the end of the option with a space-between so that the unselected options are nicely left alligned

• Table: Would be nice if it was Paginated and not just one big blob of information

• ... Action: What is it supposed to to? I can't click it.

• TableContent: Would consider making the pills in the Table fill the cell, would make it look more uniform and fit better with your full width style (Example when someone is rejected it looks super short in comparison to the not assets), but this is definitely just personal preference

[Mtze]

Table:

• Show the team in the row and allow to filter/sort by team

Student Assessment view:

• When adding action items, it would be cool to have the focus right in the text field so you can immediately start typing
• The action items should not be scrollable. I'd rather like to see a multi line action item instead of having to scroll to read one line
• Action items feel odd if they are ticked of right away - i'd rather show a different icon for the task which does not indicate that this was fullfiled yet
• Also the final comment box should not be a scrolling text field - all the text should be visible immediately

[Mtze]

Please provide Grading Scheme Feedback in this thread

[MaximilianAnzinger]

Just an opinion:
In my view, the category ‘Values Diversity’ does not meaningfully contribute to the assessment and may not be appropriate in this context. If a participant were to exhibit disrespectful or exclusionary behavior, this would warrant immediate attention and direct intervention — not deferred evaluation at a project milestone. Such issues are serious and should be addressed as they arise, rather than being folded into end-stage grading criteria.

While I appreciate the intent behind assessing inclusive collaboration and valuing diversity, I believe this category walks a very fine line between evaluating observable behavior and unintentionally introducing bias tied to personal beliefs, political views, or identity. It’s essential that any judgment here is grounded in clear, behavioral indicators directly tied to course objectives — rather than inferred attitudes — to ensure fairness, transparency, and academic integrity.

[rappm]

Thanks for the constructive and detailed feedback. We've adjusted the Respects Ideas and Values Diversity categories, let me know what you think.