Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Hi @hyang336, We had a discussion today and we are going to implement stim coding in the next few months. Please stay tuned :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Hi there,
In the interim you should be able to do stimulus coding by including a stim
column that tells the model which response should have been made for that
stimulus, and a response column that corresponds to which response was made
(rather than correct and errors). Then if you coded stim as simply 1 and -1
then specify v ~ stim this should give positive coefficients for stim.
Michael
…On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 12:25 PM tigretigre ***@***.***> wrote:
Any updates on this one? Anything I can do to contribute to move it along
more quickly?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#475 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAG7TFC3ZACZEJ4J4X3MQDLZXREA5AVCNFSM6AAAAABKBCACKKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTANZQG4ZDGNI>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Answer selected by
AlexanderFengler
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear HSSM community,
What is the correct way to use stimulus coding for responses and models? If using DDM, I take that "-1" means "incorrect" and "1" means "correct" in the response column. Could I instead use those two values to represent two response options instead of accuracy? For something like race model with more than two response options, is the response by-default stimulus coded (i.e., each particle represents evidence accumulation of one response option)?
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions