Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
@acerbjorn I see your point, and don't disagree that amplitude could be moved in this definition. That change would break backward compatibility, which we should be reluctant to do ;). This model was added from a PR from @mpmdean, so I think we should get their opinion on this too. Anyone have any preferences for whether to change |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The reason that amplitude appears as it does is to match the common form in physics at the link seen in the docs. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/disfcn.html i.e. It's very reasonable to raise the question of whether this is good notation. In light of the comment, it might be better to rename it as I also have some sympathy about the idea of changing it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@mpmdean Thanks! It does seem like We could make a new function (or 3 separate functions for boltzmann, bose, and fermi distributions?) with Any preferences? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, hope I am writing this in the right place.
The ThermalDistributionModel lineshape is defined, as far as I can tell,
However, this means that amplitude serves the same function as the center variable. By rewriting amplitude into the exponential, one gets
I think, given the name that amplitude is probably meant to be in the numerator, so it can control the height of the lineshape, So something like
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions