You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[SLPVectorizer] Use accurate cost for external users of resize shuffles (#137419)
When implementing the vectorization, we potentially need to add shuffles
for external users. In such cases, we may be shuffling a smaller vector
into a larger vector. When this happens `ResizeToVF` will just build a
poison padded identity vector. Then the to build the final shuffle, we
just use the `SK_InsertSubvector` mask.
This is possibly clearer by looking at the included test in
SLPVectorizer/AMDGPU/external-shuffle.ll
In the exit block we have a bunch of shuffles to glue the vectorized
tree match the `InsertElement` users. `TMP25` holds the result of
resizing the v2i16 vectorized sequence to match the `InsertElement` size
v16i16. Then `TMP26` is the final shuffle which replaces the
`InsertElement` sequence. This is just an insertsubvector.
However, when calculating the cost for these shuffles, we aren't
modelling this correctly. `ResizeToVF` will indicate to
`performExtractsShuffleAction` that we cannot use the original mask due
to the resize shuffle. The consequence is that the cost calculation uses
a different shuffle mask than what is ultimately used.
Going back to the included test, we can consider again `TMP26`. Clearly
we can see the shuffle uses a mask {0, 1, 2, 3, 16, 17, poison ..}.
However, we will currently calculate the cost with a mask {0, 1, 2, 3,
20, 21, ...} we have replaced 16 and 17 with 20 and 21 (Index + Vector
Size). Queries like BasicTTImpl::improveShuffleKindFromMask will not
recognize this as an `SK_InsertSubvector` mask, and targets which have
reduced costs for `SK_InsertSubvector` will not accurately calculate the
cost.
0 commit comments