Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
Thoughts? The idea is to run EPP for any base-model as part of the model sidecars rather than as a separate service. It might simplify the overall architecture for a given model. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
You can't. They don't have the same cardinality. 1 EPP for xPyD. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Should EPP exist if there are zero D pods? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
In the current stack, EPP is used as a deployment with its service. Should EPP be a container in the decode deployment in an attempt to launch fewer objects for each model service CR?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions