You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Expected behavior
Follow up from Slack Thread
Copying in @Liongrass and @alexbosworth as a heads-up, that this is a follow-up from our slack-convo.
Static Loop in first try, I'm trying to loop in with one specified UTXO to fixedfloat, with litloop static in --utxo 15a7deda35cbf2c71b2f0a97709be17d050c195d47eb19ab6624807b50c9c2dd:0 --last_hop 037f990e61acee8a7697966afd29dd88f3b1f8a7b14d625c4f8742bd952003a590 --payment_timeout "90s" --label "static loop in fixedfloat" -v
Actual behavior
It should take the UTXO and loop in with the last hop specified.
To reproduce
When confirming without the --payment_timeout "90s" flag, I get the following error
CONTINUE SWAP? (y/n): y
[loop] rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded desc = unable to initiate the loop-in with the server: rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded desc = context deadline exceeded
I can't / don't want to rapidely reproduce the error, since the fees from the first try raked up 4x right now, I'd rather wait for a cheaper time window again.
Estimated on-chain fee: 0 sat
Loop service fee: 11218 sat
Estimated total fee: 11218 sat
Conf target: 0 block
CLTV expiry delta: 0 block
Now it's at
Estimated on-chain fee: 0 sat
Loop service fee: 42860 sat
Estimated total fee: 42860 sat
With the same amount of sats. quote in reports the same
Estimated total fee: 43517 sat
I guess the route loop => last_hop raked up the fees in that one hour, so a cheap hop depleted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The error message might be a bit misleading. What actually happened is that with the given last hop, we couldn't reach you, so the service fee defaulted to a generic rate (which is usually just the routing fee + 1 sat).
Thanks @bhandras , so just to confirm: your hypothesis is, that the loop in route
couldn't reach me due to a time-out
or to a liquidity bottleneck
whereby my question to the former would be, is this mitigatable with the --payment_timeout "90s"
and wrt the latter, couldn't we get more verbose with the error messaging?
Expected behavior
Follow up from Slack Thread
Copying in @Liongrass and @alexbosworth as a heads-up, that this is a follow-up from our slack-convo.
Static Loop in first try, I'm trying to loop in with one specified UTXO to fixedfloat, with
litloop static in --utxo 15a7deda35cbf2c71b2f0a97709be17d050c195d47eb19ab6624807b50c9c2dd:0 --last_hop 037f990e61acee8a7697966afd29dd88f3b1f8a7b14d625c4f8742bd952003a590 --payment_timeout "90s" --label "static loop in fixedfloat" -v
Actual behavior
It should take the UTXO and loop in with the last hop specified.
To reproduce
When confirming without the --payment_timeout "90s" flag, I get the following error
Logs
System information
loop version 0.29.0-beta commit=v0.29.0-beta
I can't / don't want to rapidely reproduce the error, since the fees from the first try raked up 4x right now, I'd rather wait for a cheaper time window again.
I guess the route loop => last_hop raked up the fees in that one hour, so a cheap hop depleted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: