Set extra skimmed fee on intercepted forward

Receivers need to use this value to verify incoming payments if
ChannelConfig::accept_underpaying_htlcs is set.

Author: valentinewallace

lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs

@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ pub(super) struct PendingHTLCInfo {
 	/// may overshoot this in either case)
 	pub(super) outgoing_amt_msat: u64,
 	pub(super) outgoing_cltv_value: u32,
+	/// The fee being skimmed off the top of this HTLC. If this is a forward, it'll be the fee we are
+	/// skimming. If we're receiving this HTLC, it's the fee that our counterparty skimmed.
+	pub(super) skimmed_fee_msat: Option<u64>,
 }
 
 #[derive(Clone)] // See Channel::revoke_and_ack for why, tl;dr: Rust bug
@@ -2623,6 +2626,7 @@ where
 			incoming_amt_msat: Some(amt_msat),
 			outgoing_amt_msat: hop_data.amt_to_forward,
 			outgoing_cltv_value: hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value,
+			skimmed_fee_msat: None,
 		})
 	}
 
@@ -2890,6 +2894,7 @@ where
 					incoming_amt_msat: Some(msg.amount_msat),
 					outgoing_amt_msat: next_hop_data.amt_to_forward,
 					outgoing_cltv_value: next_hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value,
+					skimmed_fee_msat: None,
 				})
 			}
 		}
@@ -3527,7 +3532,10 @@ where
 			},
 			_ => unreachable!() // Only `PendingHTLCRouting::Forward`s are intercepted
 		};
+		let skimmed_fee_msat =
+			payment.forward_info.outgoing_amt_msat.saturating_sub(amt_to_forward_msat);
 		let pending_htlc_info = PendingHTLCInfo {
+			skimmed_fee_msat: if skimmed_fee_msat == 0 { None } else { Some(skimmed_fee_msat) },
 			outgoing_amt_msat: amt_to_forward_msat, routing, ..payment.forward_info
 		};
 
@@ -3597,7 +3605,7 @@ where
 										prev_short_channel_id, prev_htlc_id, prev_funding_outpoint, prev_user_channel_id,
 										forward_info: PendingHTLCInfo {
 											routing, incoming_shared_secret, payment_hash, outgoing_amt_msat,
-											outgoing_cltv_value, incoming_amt_msat: _
+											outgoing_cltv_value, ..
 										}
 									}) => {
 										macro_rules! failure_handler {
@@ -3710,7 +3718,7 @@ where
 										prev_short_channel_id, prev_htlc_id, prev_funding_outpoint, prev_user_channel_id: _,
 										forward_info: PendingHTLCInfo {
 											incoming_shared_secret, payment_hash, outgoing_amt_msat, outgoing_cltv_value,
-											routing: PendingHTLCRouting::Forward { onion_packet, .. }, incoming_amt_msat: _,
+											routing: PendingHTLCRouting::Forward { onion_packet, .. }, ..
 										},
 									}) => {
 										log_trace!(self.logger, "Adding HTLC from short id {} with payment_hash {} to channel with short id {} after delay", prev_short_channel_id, log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), short_chan_id);
@@ -7508,6 +7516,7 @@ impl_writeable_tlv_based!(PendingHTLCInfo, {
 	(6, outgoing_amt_msat, required),
 	(8, outgoing_cltv_value, required),
 	(9, incoming_amt_msat, option),
+	(10, skimmed_fee_msat, option),
 });
 
 

pending_changelog/forward-underpaying-htlc.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+## Backwards Compat
+
+* Forwarding less than the expected amount in `ChannelManager::forward_intercepted_htlc` may break
+	compatibility with versions of LDK prior to 0.0.116