Skip to content

Consistency in opcode casing. #92

@tigh-latte

Description

@tigh-latte

Currently through our code we have references to opcode and opCode, in both internal var names and error types.

This inconstency should be address before releasing v2, to prevent it become annoying and introducing the need for either accepting inconsistent behaviour, or releasing a breaking change.

I am personally going to argue for opcode and Opcode to be used, instead of opCode and OpCode, as in written English it is only one word and officially written as opcode.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't workinginterpreterscript interpreter

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions