You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I searched existing ideas and did not find a similar one
I added a very descriptive title
I've clearly described the feature request and motivation for it
Feature request
Built-In Health Check Functionality
Motivation
LangChain is widely used in many open-source projects that leverage large language models (LLMs). However, many users do not fully understand LangChain’s internal workings, which often leads to configuration errors (such as invalid API keys or non-existent model names). These misconfigurations cause connection failures with LLM APIs and result in an excessive number of bug reports across various projects. Such unnecessary issues not only hinder development efficiency but also negatively impact developer morale due to the clutter of avoidable issues in the trackers.
A built-in health check feature would allow early detection of configuration issues, providing clear, standardized feedback that helps developers address problems before they escalate. This would streamline troubleshooting and enhance the overall user experience.
Proposal (If applicable)
We propose that LangChain implements a unified health check method to validate API connectivity and configuration correctness. Key points include:
Unified Health Check Method:
Introduce a single method within LangChain that performs health checks and returns standardized responses for common error scenarios (e.g., authentication failures, invalid model names). This abstraction would handle API-specific differences internally.
Intended Usage:
The health check method is designed to be invoked by the consuming application at appropriate times—such as during configuration setup, before task execution, or immediately after an error is caught. It is the responsibility of the LangChain user (i.e., the application developer) to call this method as needed.
Abstraction and Developer Responsibility:
While the health check method will provide consistent error responses, the notification of these errors (through logs, UI alerts, etc.) will remain the responsibility of the application using LangChain. By abstracting the API-specific health check logic within LangChain, developers are spared from implementing their own checks, reducing both maintenance overhead and the volume of unnecessary bug reports.
Expected Benefits:
Reduced Bug Report Noise: Early detection of configuration issues would prevent unnecessary bug reports, keeping issue trackers cleaner and avoiding the demotivating effect of trivial errors piling up.
Enhanced Developer Experience: Clear, actionable error messages will simplify troubleshooting, allowing developers to resolve configuration problems more quickly and efficiently.
Consistent Error Handling: A built-in health check feature would standardize the way API connectivity issues are detected and reported across all supported APIs, aligning with LangChain’s goal of abstracting complexity and improving development efficiency.
We believe that adding this health check functionality to LangChain will significantly benefit the ecosystem by streamlining troubleshooting, reducing redundant bug reports, and enhancing overall developer morale. We welcome feedback and discussion on this proposal.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Checked
Feature request
Built-In Health Check Functionality
Motivation
LangChain is widely used in many open-source projects that leverage large language models (LLMs). However, many users do not fully understand LangChain’s internal workings, which often leads to configuration errors (such as invalid API keys or non-existent model names). These misconfigurations cause connection failures with LLM APIs and result in an excessive number of bug reports across various projects. Such unnecessary issues not only hinder development efficiency but also negatively impact developer morale due to the clutter of avoidable issues in the trackers.
A built-in health check feature would allow early detection of configuration issues, providing clear, standardized feedback that helps developers address problems before they escalate. This would streamline troubleshooting and enhance the overall user experience.
Proposal (If applicable)
We propose that LangChain implements a unified health check method to validate API connectivity and configuration correctness. Key points include:
Unified Health Check Method:
Introduce a single method within LangChain that performs health checks and returns standardized responses for common error scenarios (e.g., authentication failures, invalid model names). This abstraction would handle API-specific differences internally.
Intended Usage:
The health check method is designed to be invoked by the consuming application at appropriate times—such as during configuration setup, before task execution, or immediately after an error is caught. It is the responsibility of the LangChain user (i.e., the application developer) to call this method as needed.
Abstraction and Developer Responsibility:
While the health check method will provide consistent error responses, the notification of these errors (through logs, UI alerts, etc.) will remain the responsibility of the application using LangChain. By abstracting the API-specific health check logic within LangChain, developers are spared from implementing their own checks, reducing both maintenance overhead and the volume of unnecessary bug reports.
Expected Benefits:
We believe that adding this health check functionality to LangChain will significantly benefit the ecosystem by streamlining troubleshooting, reducing redundant bug reports, and enhancing overall developer morale. We welcome feedback and discussion on this proposal.
Thank you for considering this enhancement.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions