the sort code does not use topologySortingAlgorithm: KahnSort

[13567436138]

func (ts *TopologicalSort) Less(pInfo1, pInfo2 *framework.QueuedPodInfo) bool {
	p1AppGroup := networkawareutil.GetPodAppGroupLabel(pInfo1.Pod)
	p2AppGroup := networkawareutil.GetPodAppGroupLabel(pInfo2.Pod)
	ctx := context.TODO()
	logger := klog.FromContext(ctx)

	// If pods do not belong to an AppGroup, or being to different AppGroups, follow vanilla QoS Sort
	if p1AppGroup != p2AppGroup || len(p1AppGroup) == 0 {
		logger.V(4).Info("Pods do not belong to the same AppGroup CR", "p1AppGroup", p1AppGroup, "p2AppGroup", p2AppGroup)
		s := &queuesort.PrioritySort{}
		return s.Less(pInfo1, pInfo2)
	}

	// Pods belong to the same appGroup, get the CR
	logger.V(6).Info("Pods belong to the same AppGroup CR", "p1 name", pInfo1.Pod.Name, "p2 name", pInfo2.Pod.Name, "appGroup", p1AppGroup)
	agName := p1AppGroup
	appGroup := ts.findAppGroupTopologicalSort(ctx, logger, agName)

	// Get labels from both pods
	labelsP1 := pInfo1.Pod.GetLabels()
	labelsP2 := pInfo2.Pod.GetLabels()

	// Binary search to find both order index since topology list is ordered by Workload Name
	orderP1 := networkawareutil.FindPodOrder(appGroup.Status.TopologyOrder, labelsP1[agv1alpha.AppGroupSelectorLabel])
	orderP2 := networkawareutil.FindPodOrder(appGroup.Status.TopologyOrder, labelsP2[agv1alpha.AppGroupSelectorLabel])

	logger.V(6).Info("Pod order values", "p1 order", orderP1, "p2 order", orderP2)

	// Lower is better
	return orderP1 <= orderP2
}

the sort code does not use opologySortingAlgorithm: KahnSort