Is this wording about typeclasses correct in Chapter3.hs?

[bitwombat]

Chapter3 says:

As you can see, both monster and knight have similar characteristics, but they
also have some differences. So it is possible to describe their common
properties using typeclasses, but they are different data types in the end.

Do typeclasses describe their common properties (e.g. health) or the common actions that can be taken on them (e.g. fight)?

[chshersh]

Typeclasses can describe both 🙂

In Haskell, a typeclass for values that have Health:

class HasHealth a where
    getHealth :: a -> Health

and typeclass, describing the fight between two values of the same type:

class Fighter a where
    fight :: a -> a -> FightResult

However, as you can see, this Fighter typeclass allows to fight only values of the same type and not others. If you design the Fighter typeclass differently:

class Fighter a where
    ... something clever here ...

You can implement a top-level function (not a typeclass method) that performs fight between two values of different types:

fight :: (Fighter a, Fighter b) => a -> b -> FightResult