Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Did you get an answer elsewhere? I'm curious as well. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I recommend using a photodiode module primarily due to its rapid response time and precise detection capabilities, which are essential for accurately capturing the brief LED pulses emitted by energy meters. Photodiodes offer a linear and swift reaction to changes in light intensity, making them suitable for this application. However, they can saturate under strong ambient light, potentially obscuring the desired signal. LDRs, while more straightforward to implement and capable of being positioned closer to the meter's LED, have slower response times and are also affected by ambient light, which can lead to less accurate readings in environments with fluctuating light conditions. So you can use an LDR for the Home Assistant Glow. Make sure the sensor is well shielded from external light sources to maintain measurement accuracy. ./Klaas |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Is there a reason why an lm393 photodiode module is specified / preferred over an photoresitor module? I've struggled a bit with photodiodes as sensors for leds (mainly with setting thresholds correctly) but directly replacing the diode on the module with a ldr (5506) has (for me) made things much easier / reliable with added bonus that the flat ldr face sits closer to the meters led requiring a far less bulky / elaborate light proof housing etc.
I assumed from the warning in the hardware section that ldr modules are not correct but I'm struggling atm to figure out why a photodiode module would be better? Am i missing something?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions