-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
Open
Description
I compared the output from t_test and pairwise_t_test with the input argument specifying the reference group:
The output from the two are as below, the code to reproduce the table is included. I checked t.test output, and the t_test output is the same as t.test. I am not sure why the unadjusted p-value could be different from these two tests. I might have an incorrect understanding of pairwise_t_test.
On the other hand, the wilcox_test and pairwise_wilcox_test produce the same outcome.
t_test | pairwise_t_test |
---|---|
7.05e-01 | 7.65e-01 |
6.38e-01 | 7.65e-01 |
4.00e-03 | 1.52e-03 |
5.38e-04 | 7.00e-07 |
5.58e-04 | 0.00e+00 |
3.60e-06 | 0.00e+00 |
# Create a simulated toxicity test dataset
set.seed(456)
toxicity_data <- data.frame(
concentration = rep(c(0, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 50, 100), each = 4),
survival = c(
rbinom(4, 20, 0.95), # Control: ~95% survival
rbinom(4, 20, 0.93), # 0.1 mg/L: ~93% survival
rbinom(4, 20, 0.90), # 1 mg/L: ~90% survival
rbinom(4, 20, 0.85), # 5 mg/L: ~85% survival
rbinom(4, 20, 0.70), # 10 mg/L: ~70% survival
rbinom(4, 20, 0.40), # 50 mg/L: ~40% survival
rbinom(4, 20, 0.15) # 100 mg/L: ~15% survival
)
)
# Calculate survival percentage
toxicity_data <- toxicity_data %>%
mutate(
total = 20, # Assuming 20 organisms per replicate
survival_pct = (survival / total) * 100,
concentration = factor(concentration)
)
res1 <- toxicity_data %>% t_test(survival_pct ~ concentration, ref.group = "0")
res1.0 <- toxicity_data %>% pairwise_t_test(survival_pct ~ concentration, ref.group = "0")
## strangely, res1.0 and res1 give different results
knitr::kable(data.frame(t_test=res1$p,pairwise_t_test=res1.0$p),format = "markdown")
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels