declaration for module 'kaop' is needed

[KingMario]

While using Kaop-ts in Angular project, get the following error message:

Error: node_modules/kaop-ts/dist/types/index.d.ts:6:34 - error TS7016: Could not find a declaration file for module 'kaop'. '/Users/user/projects/demo/node_modules/kaop/dist/kaop.cjs.js' implicitly has an 'any' type.
  Try `npm i --save-dev @types/kaop` if it exists or add a new declaration (.d.ts) file containing `declare module 'kaop';`

6 export { inject, provider } from "kaop";
                                   ~~~~~~

[k1r0s]

I believe that you have an option "noImplicitAny" declared with true value. You can avoid this error by setting that to false.

Although im going to fix this

[KingMario]

Hi @k1r0s . Thanks for the reply.

I've created a kaop.d.ts in my project with the content declare module 'kaop';. But I think it's better to have the official solution.

Is it possible simply change the build tool of kaop to typescript, which will generate the .d.ts automatically, to fix it?

Thanks.

[k1r0s]

I'll prefer to keep kaop as bare js for now. If you don't mind to open a PR with typings for kaop.d.ts. thxsm

[k1r0s]

FYI: Just checked that kaop module isn't does not work well with latests typescript versions.

I still use them but with babel with https://www.npmjs.com/package/babel-plugin-transform-decorators-legacy

I made the decision long ago to stop updating this module til the tc39 make a decision over decorators. Im sorry, feel free to fork or open a pr

[k1r0s]

sry, didn't meant to close it

[KingMario]

Hi @k1r0s,

Since Angular building process only asks for the existence of typing declaration of kaop, I made a simple PR with minor changes on kaop by adding typescript as a precedent building tool and adding a typescript plugin for rollup. The build will add a simple .d.ts file with declarations of any for kaop's exports members.

I tested the build result with Angular project and it works. I think that PR will resolve this issue.

Please take a look at the PR to see if it's acceptable.

Thanks