Skip to content

Consistency of double underscore in BackgroundOnly names #160

@bethac07

Description

@bethac07

It looks like in our master pipeline, in 3 of the 8 channels (AGP, BFHigh, and ER), there was a typo in the MaskImage step such that the names of these channels have two underscores between the channel name and the words BackgroundOnly. How this looks for one measurement is below - there are 11 image intensity measurements, so overall, this affects 33 columns in total (22 for partners without a BFHigh channel).

In theory, everyone built their pipeline off of ours, but we had no way to enforce that, obviously, so we can't be sure without checking who does and who does not have the typo - maybe everyone does, but maybe not. Questions then

  • Do we think this is something that's going to break things? I assume we're not "fuzzy" matching the column names
  • Is this something worth fixing if it isn't consistent across all partners?
  • Is this something that is worth fixing even if it is consistent across all partners? (I assume no, this late in the game?)

I ask because I'm in the process of writing the column fix code for source_15 (where we plan to rewrite all column names containing RNA to say ER instead), and I need to know if I should fix the RNA_Background measurements to ER_Background or ER__Background

Image_Intensity_LowerQuartileIntensity_AGP__BackgroundOnly 
Image_Intensity_LowerQuartileIntensity_BFHigh__BackgroundOnly
Image_Intensity_LowerQuartileIntensity_BFLow_BackgroundOnly
Image_Intensity_LowerQuartileIntensity_Brightfield_BackgroundOnly
Image_Intensity_LowerQuartileIntensity_DNA_BackgroundOnly 
Image_Intensity_LowerQuartileIntensity_ER__BackgroundOnly 
Image_Intensity_LowerQuartileIntensity_Mito_BackgroundOnly 
Image_Intensity_LowerQuartileIntensity_RNA_BackgroundOnly

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions