Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
Yes, it is intended. Why? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks. Just stumbled upon it and thought that might have been a mistake. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For example in line 202 you patch the constant value at address "ff7_externals.pollensalta_cold_breath_atk_enter_sub_5474F0 + 0x83" with the value from variable "wide_viewport_width" which at this time equals to it's initial value 854. After the patching, the value is changed to 768 in "Widescreen::init" in case the aspect ratio is AR_WIDESCREEN_16X10. My question now is: shouldn't the value at the address have been patched with 768 instead of 854? The same goes for all other instances in "ff7_widescreen_hook_init" where the values of "wide_viewport_x" and "wide_viewport_width" are used for the patches. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello, in "ff7_widescreen_hook_init" some const values are patched with the values from "wide_viewport_x" and "wide_viewport_width". These values are being overwritten afterwards in "Widescreen::init" in case the aspect ratio is AR_WIDESCREEN_16X10 thus having patched the "wrong" values. Is this intended?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions