ec_
prefix for functions
#83
davidhodge931
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
I wouldn't naturally reach for that prefix. If anything, Thanks for the suggestion, but I'm not convinced this is a direction I'd like to go. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
ec_
is much shorter/easier prefix to type thaneasy_
but is pronounced the same.Might be too much difficulty, but an idea is to offer and encourage the use of functions with this
ec_*
prefix.If you thought it was too much upheaval for {ggeasy}, you could instead make a version 2 of this package with redesigned API and call it {ggec}
Just an idea - great package!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions