Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Since this is a question, I am moving it to discussions. In my opinion, the documentation is quite clear. It is simply natural to use a matching revision of libTorrent. Nonetheless, I will add a link to my libTorrent repo. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
As per my comment here, I was going to try to write a PKGBUILD for this rtorrent fork. I wanted to use cmake because a dynamic build that uses libraries managed by the package manager would be ideal for an Arch package.
The readme says:
But this suggests that I should be able to just use the correct system vendored libtorrent (0.13.8), it's not clear that I need to use a fork (or that one even exists). Took me some time to figure this out.
For example,
/usr/include/torrent/utils/ranges.h
tries to includerak/functional.h
, but you've removed this from your rtorrent fork, and your version of libtorrent no longer includes it.Of course this issue doesn't show up for the bazel build, but I don't have as much interest in a PKGBUILD that pulls in a bunch of internet dependencies for a static build. I think what this means is that a PKGBUILD would need to depend on something like libtorrent-jesec, which would be a separate PKGBUILD in the AUR.
(Sorry if I somehow misunderstood this issue, I mainly work with high level languages like Python.)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions