Janet 1.34.0
#1436
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Thanks for all the hard work! Two questions:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@bakpakin The absence of pre-built binaries for Linux is causing GitHub workflows that depend on action-janet-test to break. Could these be added back? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
What's Changed
module/expand-path
is wrong and confusing. #1370 by @sogaiu in Address #1370 #1373propagate
anddebug/stacktrace
. #1365) by @sogaiu in Tweak debug/stacktrace docstring (#1365) #1367propagate
anddebug/stacktrace
. #1365) by @sogaiu in Add to propagate docstring (#1365) #1392proc_get_status
compliant to OS documentation. by @llmII in Fix: makeproc_get_status
compliant to OS documentation. #1403each
macro improper behavior? #1400) by @sogaiu in Swap set / body order for each (#1400) #1402New Contributors
Full Changelog: v1.33.0...v1.34.0
This discussion was created from the release Janet 1.34.0.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions