Addition of coil geometry parameter? #18
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
If, for your use case, the coil can be described by a single element, the present structure already allows this: you can allocate element to size 1, and the description will remain generic for electromagnetic / plasma equilibrium calculations. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @imbeauf, yes exactly - it would be nice to, while still having a description defined by multiple elements, to have the geometry of the overall coil cross section easily available. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have created a Pull Request for the required extension see #22. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi all,
Instead of only describing the pf coil geometries through individual elements, e.g.
coil(i1)/element(i2)/geometry
,it would be really useful also just to have the geometry information for each coil immediately available individually, e.g.
coil(i1)/geometry
.This seems like something that could be easily added to the structure without compromising existing workflows. Is there a reason why this information is omitted?
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions