NAMI not cip69 compatible

[elRaulito]

When an input from contract has not datum, Nami thinks it's coming from a regular address and asks for the signature

In plutus v3 datum is not required therefore signature won't be present
the validator script will be present istead

failed:
eb27a8514f650ea8738a2dcef10f22f3e3e4bd9d6b1af41a94aa0ec32f2211e5
Some signatures are missing. A signed transaction must carry signatures for all inputs locked by verification keys or a native script. Transaction may also need signatures for each required extra signatories often required by Plutus Scripts. The field 'data.missingSignatories' contains the verification key hashes of expected but missing signatories.
Data: {"missingSignatories":["3230f3088ea556970fa4ad23062814bbee812ce5b55f70e8d1df1c0c"]}