[meta] CONTRIBUTING.md: link to CoC; soft wrap instead of hard wrap

Author: ljharb

CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 # Contributing
 
-Thanks for your interest in helping out! Here are a **few** _weird_ tricks to
-~~cut your mortgage in half~~ maximize the global net efficiency of your efforts!
+Thanks for your interest in helping out! Here are a **few** _weird_ tricks to ~~cut your mortgage in half~~ maximize the global net efficiency of your efforts!
 
 ## TL;DR: Checklist
 
@@ -21,33 +20,24 @@ Remember, you don't need to do it all yourself; any of these are helpful! 😎
 
 ### Search open + closed issues for similar cases.
 
-  You may find an open issue that closely matches what you are thinking. You
-  may also find a closed issue with discussion that either solves your problem
-  or explains why we are unlikely to solve it in the near future.
+  You may find an open issue that closely matches what you are thinking. You may also find a closed issue with discussion that either solves your problem or explains why we are unlikely to solve it in the near future.
 
-  If you find a matching issue that is open, and marked `accepted` and/or `help
-  wanted`, you might want to [open a PR](#prs).
+  If you find a matching issue that is open, and marked `accepted` and/or `help wanted`, you might want to [open a PR](#prs).
 
 ### Open an issue.
 
-  Let's discuss your issue. Could be as simple as unclear documentation or a
-  wonky config file.
-  If you're suggesting a feature, it might exist and need better
-  documentation, or it might be in process. Even given those, some discussion might
-  be warranted to ensure the enhancement is clear.
+  Let's discuss your issue. Could be as simple as unclear documentation or a wonky config file.
+  If you're suggesting a feature, it might exist and need better documentation, or it might be in process. Even given those, some discussion might be warranted to ensure the enhancement is clear.
 
-  You're welcome to jump right to a PR, but without a discussion, can't make any
-  guarantees about merging.
+  You're welcome to jump right to a PR, but without a discussion, can't make any guarantees about merging.
 
   That said: sometimes seeing the code makes the discussion clearer.😄
 
 This is a helpful contribution all by itself. Thanks!
 
 ## PRs
 
-If you would like to implement something, firstly: thanks! Community contributions
-are a magical thing. Like Redux or [the flux capacitor](https://youtu.be/SR5BfQ4rEqQ?t=2m25s),
-they make open source possible.
+If you would like to implement something, firstly: thanks! Community contributions are a magical thing. Like Redux or [the flux capacitor](https://youtu.be/SR5BfQ4rEqQ?t=2m25s), they make open source possible.
 
 **Working on your first Pull Request?**
 You can learn how from this _free_ series [How to Contribute to an Open Source Project on GitHub](https://egghead.io/series/how-to-contribute-to-an-open-source-project-on-github).
@@ -56,61 +46,26 @@ Here are some things to keep in mind when working on a PR:
 
 #### Tests
 
-A PR that is just failing test cases for an existing issue is very helpful, as this
-can take as much time (if not more) as it takes to implement a new feature or fix
-a bug.
+A PR that is just failing test cases for an existing issue is very helpful, as this can take as much time (if not more) as it takes to implement a new feature or fix a bug.
 
-If you only have enough time to write tests, fantastic! Submit away. This is a great
-jumping-off point for a core contributor or even another PR to continue what you've started.
+If you only have enough time to write tests, fantastic! Submit away. This is a great jumping-off point for a core contributor or even another PR to continue what you've started.
 
 #### Docs
 
-For enhancements to rules, please update the docs in `docs/rules` matching the rule
-filename from `src/rules`.
+For enhancements to rules, please update the docs in `docs/rules` matching the rule filename from `src/rules`.
 
-Also, take a quick look at the rule summary in [README.md] in case it could use tweaking,
-or add a line if you've implemented a new rule.
+Also, take a quick look at the rule summary in [README.md] in case it could use tweaking, or add a line if you've implemented a new rule.
 
-Bugfixes may not warrant docs changes, though it's worth skimming the existing
-docs to see if there are any relevant caveats that need to be removed.
+Bugfixes may not warrant docs changes, though it's worth skimming the existing docs to see if there are any relevant caveats that need to be removed.
 
 #### Changelog
 
-Please add a quick blurb to the [**Unreleased**](./CHANGELOG.md#unreleased) section of the change log. Give yourself
-some credit, and please link back to the PR for future reference. This is especially
-helpful for resolver changes, as the resolvers are less frequently modified and published.
+Please add a quick blurb to the [**Unreleased**](./CHANGELOG.md#unreleased) section of the change log. Give yourself some credit, and please link back to the PR for future reference. This is especially helpful for resolver changes, as the resolvers are less frequently modified and published.
 
-Note also that the change log can't magically link back to Github entities (i.e. PRs,
-issues, users) or rules; there are a handful of footnote URL definitions at the bottom.
-You may need to add one or more URL if you've square-bracketed any such items.
+Note also that the change log can't magically link back to Github entities (i.e. PRs, issues, users) or rules; there are a handful of footnote URL definitions at the bottom. You may need to add one or more URL if you've square-bracketed any such items.
 
 ## Code of Conduct
 
-This is not so much a set of guidelines as a reference for what I hope may become
-a shared perspective on the project. I hope to write a longer essay to this end
-in the future. Comments are welcome, I'd like this to be as clear as possible.
+Please familiarize yourself with the [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/import-js/.github/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
 
-### Empathy
-
-People have feelings and perspectives, and people say and believe things for good reasons.
-
-If you find that you summarily disagree with a perspective stated by someone else,
-you likely each have histories that have moved you in opposite directions on a continuum
-that probably does not have a "wrong" or "right" end. It may be that you simply
-are working toward different goals that require different strategies. Every decision
-has pros and cons, and could result in some winners and some losers. It's great to
-discuss this so that both are well-known, and realize that even with infinite discussion,
-cons and losers will likely never go to zero.
-
-Also note that we're not doing brain surgery here, so while it's fine if we spend some time
-understanding each other, cordial disagreement should not be expensive in the
-long run, and we can accept that we will get some things wrong before we get them right (if ever!).
-
-If we can all get together behind the common goal of embracing empathy, everything else should be able to work itself out.
-
-#### Attribution
-
-Thanks for help from https://mozillascience.github.io/working-open-workshop/contributing/
-for inspiration before I wrote this. --ben
-
-[README.md]: ./README.md
+[README.md]: ./README.md