Missing `region` argument for `aws_ec2_image_block_public_access` resource

[posquit0]

Terraform and AWS Provider Version

Terraform v1.13.2
on darwin_arm64
+ provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/aws v6.12.0

Affected Resource(s) or Data Source(s)

• aws_ec2_image_block_public_access

Expected Behavior

aws_ec2_image_block_public_access resource should have a region argument when the version of aws provider is >= 6.0.0 because this setting is regional.

Actual Behavior

aws_ec2_image_block_public_access resource doesn't have a region argument.

Relevant Error/Panic Output

Sample Terraform Configuration

Click to expand configuration

Steps to Reproduce

No steps.

Debug Logging

Click to expand log output

GenAI / LLM Assisted Development

n/a

Important Facts and References

No response

Would you like to implement a fix?

No

[github-actions]

Community Guidelines

This comment is added to every new Issue to provide quick reference to how the Terraform AWS Provider is maintained. Please review the information below, and thank you for contributing to the community that keeps the provider thriving! 🚀

Voting for Prioritization

• Please vote on this Issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize it.
• Please see our prioritization guide for additional information on how the maintainers handle prioritization.
• Please do not leave +1 or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions; they generate extra noise for others following the Issue and do not help prioritize the request.

Volunteering to Work on This Issue

• If you are interested in working on this issue, please leave a comment.
• If this would be your first contribution, please review the contribution guide.
• For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.

[justinretzolk]

Hey @posquit0 👋 Thank you for taking the time to raise this! This is a bit of an odd one -- if the resource should have a region argument, I can see where it could be called a bug given the enhanced region support in v6.x. That said, generally the addition of additional functionality/arguments is something we consider an enhancement.

I'm going to keep thinking on how we should classify these in the future, should they come up, but for now, I'm going to stick with the established precedent and reclassify this as an enhancement.

No further action is needed from you at this point, I just wanted to let you know why I was changing the labels around.