Skip to content

Training issue #10

@jli2972

Description

@jli2972

Hello,

Thank you for sharing the code and data.

I encountered an issue when running train_feature_extractor and test_rogue_device_detection using the provided parameters and datasets, as described in your paper and code.

The training results for train_feature_extractor are attached. Both the training and validation losses are very low—are these values consistent with your experiments?

However, when I used the trained model for test_rogue_device_detection, the resulting ROC curve (attached) showed an AUC of only 0.53, which is significantly lower than expected. According to the paper, the AUC for extractor_1 should exceed 0.9.

Could you please let me know if you modified any training parameters or preprocessing steps during your experiments? Any guidance would be appreciated.

Thanks.

Image
Image

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions