Skip to content

Commit 5a72092

Browse files
hwillsonbenjie
andauthored
Distributed schema agenda item for the 2023-12-07 WG call (#1438)
Co-authored-by: Benjie <benjie@jemjie.com>
1 parent 88598d5 commit 5a72092

File tree

1 file changed

+8
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+8
-0
lines changed

agendas/2023/12-Dec/07-wg-primary.md

Lines changed: 8 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ hold additional secondary meetings later in the month.
105105
| Lee Byron (Host) | @leebyron | GraphQL Foundation | San Francisco, CA, US |
106106
| Benjie Gillam | @benjie | Graphile | Chandler's Ford, UK |
107107
| Matt Mahoney | @mjmahone | Meta | New York, NY, US |
108+
| Jeff Auriemma | @bignimbus | Apollo | Monroe, CT, US |
109+
| Hugh Willson | @hwillson | Apollo | Manotick, ON, CA |
108110

109111
## Agenda
110112

@@ -151,6 +153,12 @@ hold additional secondary meetings later in the month.
151153
- Note: not all items closed were "action items"
152154
- [All open action items (by last update)](https://github.com/graphql/graphql-wg/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Action+item+%3Aclapper%3A%22+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
153155
- [All open action items (by meeting)](https://github.com/graphql/graphql-wg/projects?type=classic&query=is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
156+
1. Subcommittee to work on standardizing distributed schemas (15m, Jeff/Hugh)
157+
- There has been a lot of new excitement across the community around standardizing on an approach for working with distributed schemas, ranging from Open Federation to Fusion
158+
- We (Apollo) are excited about these developments, and are looking forward to working with others on this standardization approach
159+
- We haven't seen the afore mentioned standardization efforts be brought to the Working Group yet, so we'd like to get the ball rolling and start discussions
160+
- Should we start the [composite schema](https://github.com/graphql/composite-schemas-wg) subcommittee back up, to collaborate more closely? Or would folks like to explore an alternative approach?
161+
- Regardless, let's get the discussions going - super exciting!
154162
1. Fix bug in CoerceArgumentValues() algorithm (10m, Benjie)
155163
- [Spec PR](https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/pull/1056)
156164
- No GraphQL.js PR needed, GraphQL.js already implements the correct behavior

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)