You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: agendas/2023/12-Dec/07-wg-primary.md
+8Lines changed: 8 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ hold additional secondary meetings later in the month.
105
105
| Lee Byron (Host) |@leebyron| GraphQL Foundation | San Francisco, CA, US |
106
106
| Benjie Gillam |@benjie| Graphile | Chandler's Ford, UK |
107
107
| Matt Mahoney |@mjmahone| Meta | New York, NY, US |
108
+
| Jeff Auriemma |@bignimbus| Apollo | Monroe, CT, US |
109
+
| Hugh Willson |@hwillson| Apollo | Manotick, ON, CA |
108
110
109
111
## Agenda
110
112
@@ -151,6 +153,12 @@ hold additional secondary meetings later in the month.
151
153
- Note: not all items closed were "action items"
152
154
-[All open action items (by last update)](https://github.com/graphql/graphql-wg/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Action+item+%3Aclapper%3A%22+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
153
155
-[All open action items (by meeting)](https://github.com/graphql/graphql-wg/projects?type=classic&query=is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
156
+
1. Subcommittee to work on standardizing distributed schemas (15m, Jeff/Hugh)
157
+
- There has been a lot of new excitement across the community around standardizing on an approach for working with distributed schemas, ranging from Open Federation to Fusion
158
+
- We (Apollo) are excited about these developments, and are looking forward to working with others on this standardization approach
159
+
- We haven't seen the afore mentioned standardization efforts be brought to the Working Group yet, so we'd like to get the ball rolling and start discussions
160
+
- Should we start the [composite schema](https://github.com/graphql/composite-schemas-wg) subcommittee back up, to collaborate more closely? Or would folks like to explore an alternative approach?
161
+
- Regardless, let's get the discussions going - super exciting!
154
162
1. Fix bug in CoerceArgumentValues() algorithm (10m, Benjie)
0 commit comments