Skip to content

Better request for timescaledb when we have huge data #2034

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
AlexFavre opened this issue May 27, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Better request for timescaledb when we have huge data #2034

AlexFavre opened this issue May 27, 2025 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@AlexFavre
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Increase the user experience

Describe the solution you'd like
For request where the time duration is over 1 day, use this timescaledb solution
https://www.timescale.com/blog/slow-grafana-performance-learn-how-to-fix-it-using-downsampling

Additional context
Other timescaledb documentation:
https://docs.timescale.com/api/latest/hyperfunctions/downsampling/#lttb

@AlexFavre
Copy link
Author

Maybe an option to activate manualy this solution

@yesoreyeram
Copy link
Collaborator

Are you using timescaledb as zabbix backend ?

@yesoreyeram yesoreyeram moved this to Awaiting Response in OSS Big Tent May 28, 2025
@yesoreyeram yesoreyeram self-assigned this May 28, 2025
@AlexFavre
Copy link
Author

AlexFavre commented May 28, 2025

Hi,

Yes, I use timescaleDB over Postgresql and this my db for my zabbix servers

@yesoreyeram
Copy link
Collaborator

Have you tried direct db connection mode instead. Which have better timescale support.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Awaiting Response
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants